Starship | SN11 | High-Altitude Flight Test

30 märts 2021
3 321 897 Vaatamised

As early as Tuesday, March 30, the SpaceX team will attempt a high-altitude flight test of Starship serial number 11 (SN11) - our fourth high-altitude flight test of a Starship prototype from Starbase in Texas. Similar to previous high-altitude flight tests of Starship, SN11 will be powered through ascent by three Raptor engines, each shutting down in sequence prior to the vehicle reaching apogee - approximately 10 km in altitude. SN11 will perform a propellant transition to the internal header tanks, which hold landing propellant, before reorienting itself for reentry and a controlled aerodynamic descent.

The Starship prototype will descend under active aerodynamic control, accomplished by independent movement of two forward and two aft flaps on the vehicle. All four flaps are actuated by an onboard flight computer to control Starship’s attitude during flight and enable precise landing at the intended location. SN11’s Raptor engines will then reignite as the vehicle attempts a landing flip maneuver immediately before touching down on the landing pad adjacent to the launch mount.
A controlled aerodynamic descent with body flaps and vertical landing capability, combined with in-space refilling, are critical to landing Starship at destinations across the solar system where prepared surfaces or runways do not exist, and returning to Earth. This capability will enable a fully reusable transportation system designed to carry both crew and cargo on long-duration, interplanetary flights and help humanity return to the Moon, and travel to Mars and beyond.
Given the dynamic schedule of development testing, stay tuned to our social media channels for updates as we move toward SpaceX’s fourth high-altitude flight test of Starship!

Kommentaarid
  • Never give up!

    yOkay_yOkay_31 minut tagasi
  • Coming soon: the launch of SN12

    GD gamerGD gamer6 tundi tagasi
    • You are wrong bro, next will be SN15

      BieganBiegan25 minutit tagasi
  • 5:47

    Xeno SFS - SFS Content and NewsXeno SFS - SFS Content and News7 tundi tagasi
  • 5:47

    Xeno SFS - SFS Content and NewsXeno SFS - SFS Content and News7 tundi tagasi
  • #SpaceX Why don't you use the same system for landing as you do with your Falcon rockets and your intended main Starship booster? It works!

    Phil Rosa-LeekePhil Rosa-Leeke14 tundi tagasi
    • Starship in particular will be coming from orbital speeds, both on earth and mars and going into a belly flop burns off a lot more speed than descending like the falcon 9 and the first stage. It also has more maneuverability at said angle with its fins. The landing system coming out of that belly flop needs to be able to land in rough terrain and landing like a rocket is much easier than landing like a plane. It also makes it easier to take off again.

      Lmao.Lmao.13 tundi tagasi
  • Is a question of doctrin.If you cant understand,just pay for the Spitfire.

    Enrico CivardiEnrico Civardi14 tundi tagasi
  • There is Space Mafia.No,is not possible build there,Pig,you have to pay.We love the Spitfire.

    Enrico CivardiEnrico Civardi14 tundi tagasi
  • Nice video keep it up make more related videos

    K JayanthK Jayanth15 tundi tagasi
  • Others have asked this already: please put some telemetry on screen!

    Franco CFranco C16 tundi tagasi
  • Hi good nice to see

    Shahbaz ahmedShahbaz ahmed21 tund tagasi
  • There is a better way to land StarShip and the heavy booster. If the landing pad was made out of a metal grid of sorts and raised 50+ feet into the air, when a space craft comes in for a landing the pad drops as the craft touches down. The pad then does all the breaking so no major legs are needed to cushion the landing. This is a much safer way to land. The drop and break landing pad absorbs all the energy. It can be made very low tech so as not to fail. Come on we can do this!

    htannberghtannbergPäev tagasi
  • Amazing

    Virtual PinballVirtual PinballPäev tagasi
  • wow is realy cool:)

    Patate LechatPatate Lechat2 päeva tagasi
  • I,m not an engineer but as I've seen the lift and landing, in case of landing maneuver it seems to have huge momentum that the engines can't harmonize the huge momentum to the required landing momentum or speed. Perhaps it may need more time as that landing maneuver must start from a reasonably high distance to enable the engines to harmonize the huge momentum, parachuting may be needed to reduce the great pressure created by engines abruptly to absorb the kinetic energy , in turn may lead to destroying the ship.

    gamil sultangamil sultan2 päeva tagasi
    • Flipping higher wouldn’t help if an engine explodes (Like it did here)

      Jack WhitlockJack WhitlockPäev tagasi
  • What a foggy day, can't see a thing

    Marc Christian CastorMarc Christian Castor2 päeva tagasi
  • starship is not coming back so starship went to the space ;)

    lyric layslyric lays2 päeva tagasi
    • передоз селитрой

      hoiy vinosahoiy vinosa2 päeva tagasi
  • Add Russian subtitles, please

    Витёк КрутВитёк Крут2 päeva tagasi
    • parese que el clima afecta el gas puede estar caliente o frio escuche uno de los audios y exploto porque estaba frio

      hoiy vinosahoiy vinosa2 päeva tagasi
  • FAA Clear sunny day: Not today FAA Intense thick fog: LEZZZDODISSHIIIT!!!

    hoiy vinosahoiy vinosa2 päeva tagasi
  • Past, present and future is but a stubborn Illusion-- Sir Albert Einstein You are my inspiration Sir Elon Musk

    UNDAWN harshUNDAWN harsh3 päeva tagasi
  • Ok when we loose the signal. The simple reason is starship burned away.

    infospot100infospot1003 päeva tagasi
    • Not really but okay

      TimeProTimePro3 päeva tagasi
  • Wow, so exciting!✨🚀

    miko foinmiko foin3 päeva tagasi
    • 6.06 look at the middle you will find some lil fire coming out that’s leakage

      hoiy vinosahoiy vinosa2 päeva tagasi
  • Oof

    samusamu3 päeva tagasi
  • space is so 20th century

    ufor uforufor ufor4 päeva tagasi
    • @Ferocious Gamer Hilarious

      Space XSpace X2 päeva tagasi
    • so going to mars is something we would do in 1990?

      Ferocious GamerFerocious Gamer4 päeva tagasi
  • 6:12 The engine failed here and that's why Starship SN11 is not coming back.

    Houa HouaHoua Houa4 päeva tagasi
  • Took 1000 tests to get the light bulb formula right. This is #11. @ElonMusk and the team are doing just fine.

    Anthony C CarnellAnthony C Carnell4 päeva tagasi
    • @miko foin Absolutely - we think the same way. Have a great Friday

      Anthony C CarnellAnthony C Carnell3 päeva tagasi
    • “Remember, making mistakes is part of the process. The key to success is to make mistakes quickly, and recover quickly, and keep forging forward.” ― Kevin J. Donaldson

      miko foinmiko foin3 päeva tagasi
  • too bad there's no space programs anymore even space movies goes out in touch with realities because we keep changing display technologies, what is space missions without displays. Unless spaceships is loaded with technologies and there's holodeck, where to have such realities, I still duno....if it's possible. But space will blow your mind is it comparable with colorfull 3D biotech...

    ufor uforufor ufor4 päeva tagasi
  • Ha

    gaurang joshigaurang joshi4 päeva tagasi
  • thank You for what you guys are doing for humanity! Peace.

    gioyu comigioyu comi4 päeva tagasi
    • Can't you even Launch this Thing from a Pläne Like the Steam Chase to practice only the landing maneuver

      abbsnn coseabbsnn cose4 päeva tagasi
  • Thanks ! I know you all are very busy, but I wish Elon Musk and Team could find the time to help Pr. Biden & Congress implement the *American Jobs Plan* . Watching your amazing *skills* , the needs of America and the reality of the Work Force, there is a huge gap that this next Stimulus must end or Asia will eat USA lunch and dinner. Sometimes just pointing in the right direction and goals can make a World of Differences.

    Joseph MartinJoseph Martin4 päeva tagasi
    • “Remember, making mistakes is part of the process. The key to success is to make mistakes quickly, and recover quickly, and keep forging forward.” ― Kevin J. Donaldson

      abbsnn coseabbsnn cose4 päeva tagasi
  • Hey space X, Got some ideas for yall one increase the cone sizes of the raptor engines doesn't have to be circular maybe another spade, why can you add the honey comb slider like the other rocket, with the capability of closing the holes with the comb and control air flow, can aerodynamics help as well. Just an idea.

    Dragone Inc.Dragone Inc.4 päeva tagasi
    • Well that was a dud. Seriously, if you can't get the cameras to work? And unless you're suicidal you wouldn't want to be the first to fly Musky Air

      gioyu comigioyu comi4 päeva tagasi
  • parese que el clima afecta el gas puede estar caliente o frio escuche uno de los audios y exploto porque estaba frio

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez5 päeva tagasi
  • передоз селитрой

    Eby HohloskotEby Hohloskot5 päeva tagasi
  • This will be known as USS Enterprise NCC-1701A will it have warp drive functionality

    WallstreetbetsWallstreetbets5 päeva tagasi
    • Wall street bets avatar i see

      Mudkip909Mudkip9095 päeva tagasi
  • Who down voted this are you offended by a rocket?

    Jay__KaayJay__Kaay5 päeva tagasi
  • Not today. :)

    MaxwellMaxwell5 päeva tagasi
  • 6.06 look at the middle you will find some lil fire coming out that’s leakage

    MemgiMemgi5 päeva tagasi
  • Whenever it is going to land space X hides it from us. Something is suspicious

    THE ROCKERSTHE ROCKERS5 päeva tagasi
    • @THE ROCKERS "not to argue with fools" no wonder you're so confident in yourself.

      Lmao.Lmao.13 tundi tagasi
    • ​@THE ROCKERS Bruh this is a VERY work in progress design, they didn't nail falcon 9 for a while

      Bloody EvolutionBloody Evolution15 tundi tagasi
    • @TimePro u look at some falcon9 landings and others. Oh i am sorry Because I have a simple rule in life "not to argue with fools" and you are correct my friend.

      THE ROCKERSTHE ROCKERSPäev tagasi
    • They must have one hell of a fog machine...

      Brent SmithBrent SmithPäev tagasi
    • Look at SN10 and the previous attempts and say that again.

      TimeProTimePro5 päeva tagasi
  • F

    SantosSantos5 päeva tagasi
  • Man will go mars no earlier than 2040. Even a small cybertruck takes years to be released to public, I can't imagine how long it will take starship to meet all the requirements. Probably decades. The news says we will see Man on mars very soon, just to keep us high expectations, but I think it's just marketing. I'm just being realistic.

    Igor Delta F.Igor Delta F.5 päeva tagasi
  • “Remember, making mistakes is part of the process. The key to success is to make mistakes quickly, and recover quickly, and keep forging forward.” ― Kevin J. Donaldson

    abbsnn coseabbsnn cose5 päeva tagasi
  • Can't you even Launch this Thing from a Pläne Like the Steam Chase to practice only the landing maneuver

    Philipp SchmidtbauerPhilipp Schmidtbauer5 päeva tagasi
  • Go on man You will conquer

    Soumya TajSoumya Taj5 päeva tagasi
  • Well that was a dud. Seriously, if you can't get the cameras to work? And unless you're suicidal you wouldn't want to be the first to fly Musky Air

    Erik BrunerErik Bruner5 päeva tagasi
    • Try to fix them let's see how that will go

      AmadoAmado3 päeva tagasi
    • Don't you guys have patience men!!

      abbsnn coseabbsnn cose5 päeva tagasi
  • eeworld.info/chat/1q9naYiEfHelktQ/video ❤️🙏

    Paz C.Paz C.5 päeva tagasi
  • It may of failed but I know SpaceX they keep going! Mars here we come!

    IllustrationIllustration6 päeva tagasi
  • An Idea. Why not to use helium atmosphere under the skirt of starship? It can eliminate burning of raptor engine and helium is allready in nose cone tank.

    standal001standal0016 päeva tagasi
  • You should make a compilation of failed starship launches and landings. That would be fun, especially with some dramatic music in the background. I suggest Edvard Grieg

    Mikhail SporyshevMikhail Sporyshev6 päeva tagasi
  • Okay

    Master PieceMaster Piece6 päeva tagasi
  • “Remember, making mistakes is part of the process. The key to success is to make mistakes quickly, and recover quickly, and keep forging forward.” ― Kevin J. Donaldson

    doire aintudoire aintu6 päeva tagasi
  • great!

    Igor LIgor L6 päeva tagasi
  • What font is used for the timer? It's beautiful

    CoolJRTCoolJRT6 päeva tagasi
    • Clock: *is beautiful* Clock: *freezes* *American engineering at its finest* Ever heard of a Swiss clock failing?

      CoolJRTCoolJRT6 päeva tagasi
  • What is happenig with SN11?

    N MN M6 päeva tagasi
    • They could also easily crawl back into the skiff to take a break, eat, rest, use the toilet, whatever to satisfy basic personal needs. Astronauts could safely, comfortably and easil

      doire aintudoire aintu6 päeva tagasi
  • Uh i tink the engean imploded and fire to full and boom

    lets game it out on robloxlets game it out on roblox6 päeva tagasi
  • “Remember, making mistakes is part of the process. The key to success is to make mistakes quickly, and recover quickly, and keep forging forward.” ― Kevin J. Donaldson

    aola wiliaola wili6 päeva tagasi
  • Dust yourself off and make another ship Elon. Eventually you will succeed again. I look forward to watching it happen. 🌟 Cheers to SN12

    Cassandra Lynne Rose WilsonCassandra Lynne Rose Wilson6 päeva tagasi
    • next is SN15 SN12-14 got skipped because their designs were out dated

      AmadoAmado3 päeva tagasi
  • .SPACEX DILDO'S FOR TITANS. wHy dO hUMaNS HaVE aLL tHE fUN?? Based on the thumbnail....i didn't watch the video. Ok bei

    M A D A R AM A D A R A6 päeva tagasi
  • 5:48 launch 8:02 shut down 1st engine 922 2nd engine shutdown 10:09 3rd engine shutdown - decent 11:39 relight Frozen camera

    BigMoBigMo6 päeva tagasi
    • Another one bites the dust Another one bites the dust Another one down, and another one down

      aola wiliaola wili6 päeva tagasi
  • Don't you guys have patience men!!

    Saurabh JhaSaurabh Jha6 päeva tagasi
  • Lovely, video freezes just as engines fire up :/

    Mike MalloyMike Malloy6 päeva tagasi
  • 👍

    Devansh DDevansh D6 päeva tagasi
  • Meanwhile, they got tech that can do this ... wait shhh.

    weavergradweavergrad6 päeva tagasi
  • I wonder why did they launch in this foggy weather? After all they were not putting anything in orbit. Probably the FAA had something to do with this such as a time-line window.

    D HanselD Hansel6 päeva tagasi
  • ارجو ان يصل كلامي اليكم ؟ توجد طريقه اكثر امانا وفعاليه للذهاب للمريخ والعوده منه ولكن من خلال صواريخ هجينة متعددة وليس مثل ما تقومون به من تجارب تنتهي بالفشل

    Ali AlzedawyAli Alzedawy6 päeva tagasi
    • ok

      Jul1anJul1an3 päeva tagasi
  • do yall play rocket simulator or just play it irl

    beasticksbeasticks6 päeva tagasi
  • Space x is controlled by Nasa so there is no difference between them and what nasa puts out both lie about going to space which they can't do .

    thomas wellnitzthomas wellnitz6 päeva tagasi
    • @Amado lol

      Ferocious GamerFerocious Gamer3 päeva tagasi
    • @thomas wellnitz naive hahhahah did you read your own comments

      AmadoAmado3 päeva tagasi
    • @thomas wellnitz Uno reverse

      random gamesrandom games3 päeva tagasi
    • @Ferocious Gamer if you think they are going to own part of it and not control it then you are very naive .

      thomas wellnitzthomas wellnitz4 päeva tagasi
    • @thomas wellnitz part ownership is not control

      Ferocious GamerFerocious Gamer4 päeva tagasi
  • Never will understand why you run two engines lean, can't make power without BTUs. Run them fat on the test stand. Flow pressures are different installed in the rocket. Oh well who am I. Should use inline accumulators at the engine in plumbing at the puck.

    Ray TurnerRay Turner7 päeva tagasi
    • I highly doubt they're running the engines lean. You always, always run rocket engines rich. Otherwise they disintegrate.

      Brent SmithBrent Smith5 päeva tagasi
  • Elon don't let messy science slow you down ;)

    Norberto VazNorberto Vaz7 päeva tagasi
  • I'm sure you get a lot of ideas submitted like this and maybe its even annoying, but here goes another. Does SpaceX plan to develop any kind of need or capacity for in flight EVAs for things like repairs, inspections, upgrades, rescues, etc,? During an ISS EVA Chris Hadfield got something in his eye, a flake of soap I think. It completely incapacitated him and put him in significant peril for awhile. It seems silly that such a small thing created such a big problem for a highly trained astronaut in an expensive high tech suit! In an ordinary work environment a person, even weightless, would just wipe the crap out their eye with a finger, no problemo. It's kind of a big flaw in these high tech conventional space suits that their design robs the astronauts of a capacity for such simple basic human actions. I started thinking of a way to fix this. I came up with the idea of a skiffsuit. A skiffsuit would be a small spacecraft, skiff, with capacity to maneuver in orbit or in flight to Mars. It would be big enough to support 2 astronauts for a day or two. About the size of a Chevy van. It would have the upper half of a spacesuit on the end of a tubular cherry picker or space arm extension. Astronauts would crawl into the tube to put their upper body into the space suit end with some footholds in the tube. The space arm tube could then be maneuvered into position by the astronaut to do repair, upgrade, inspection work by the astronaut. The skiff would have an automated station keeping that would counter any forces the astronaut has to apply to the work. The skiff, space arm and suit would all be one continuous pressurized volume. If an astronaut got something in their eye, got a bad cramp or whatever they could just crawl back into the bigger volume of the skiff to fix it. They could also easily crawl back into the skiff to take a break, eat, rest, use the toilet, whatever to satisfy basic personal needs. Astronauts could safely, comfortably and easily conduct EVA work for days in the skiff. I got the idea watching power grid workers working on transmission lines from cherry picker trucks. I noticed they never used their lower bodies other than just to stand in the buckets. They did complicated and precise work to a high standard with just their upper bodies.

    Charles BelhumeurCharles Belhumeur7 päeva tagasi
  • Keep up the hard work SpaceX!

    MarkMark7 päeva tagasi
  • Amazing

    YAGIZ ALPERYAGIZ ALPER7 päeva tagasi
  • nice cgi fog. sure was cheaper that way

    zoxoorzoxoor7 päeva tagasi
    • It's not CGI fog you sheep fuck, it's a fog machine.

      Lmao.Lmao.13 tundi tagasi
    • Ok so you’re saying that fog isn’t real. Got it. I’ll remember your comment when I see fog for the next time.

      Mudkip909Mudkip9095 päeva tagasi
    • Not even fog can be real now?

      Cristian UkmarCristian Ukmar6 päeva tagasi
    • what tf?

      ivanflinnivanflinn7 päeva tagasi
  • Another one bites the dust Another one bites the dust Another one down, and another one down

    Red RayRed Ray7 päeva tagasi
    • Another one bites the E

      Mudkip909Mudkip9095 päeva tagasi
  • “The crater was in the right place “. Like a boss !

    mikea hiooimikea hiooi7 päeva tagasi
  • What if you didn't use wings and instead use the magnus effect to slow the speed. The rocket is put on its side and then rotated by the cold gas thrusters. in the end the rotation is stopped because it ran out of rotational energie or by the thruster (maybe even main thruster, they have to be reignited anyway). Benefits of this system would be safed weight by not needing the flaps, when reentering the side that is on the top at a given moment can cool down (would need heatshield all around but way thinner. Also the consequential horizontal movement that is introduced by the magnus effect could help bring starship back to the site.

    Tobias HohmannTobias Hohmann7 päeva tagasi
    • Not sure if I completely understand that you're saying, but it would probably have very strong g force's do to the fact that it would be spinning, and it they lost control at all, they couldn't get it back. Still a cool idea tho

      random gamesrandom games6 päeva tagasi
  • .

    Zaeed AYMZaeed AYM7 päeva tagasi
  • boom

    NOOBSTORENOOBSTORE7 päeva tagasi
    • Hajmou nebesa

      mikea hiooimikea hiooi7 päeva tagasi
  • Too hot for TV during the landing...

    VF1SkullangelVF1Skullangel7 päeva tagasi
  • Hm! I think a comprehensive structural analysis of the materials to build the engines, pipes and tanks is in order. Possible defective materials, construction debris perhaps but not likely as that should show up during static firing. Although I think those static tests are too short, and not enough lengthy refireing. After all,, that's where the problem is coming from. Are you using identical SN Tanks during your tests instead of direct feed of fuel?

    John RuckmanJohn Ruckman7 päeva tagasi
  • That's their mission, to land on mars.. Alive or dead

    premraju prempremraju prem7 päeva tagasi
  • Falla al despegue se ahoga, dice el audio es facil escucharlo es como un disco duro cuando el lector del CD se mueve dice uno.

    Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez7 päeva tagasi
    • el cpu se calienta lo dice cuando empiesa a despegar

      Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez6 päeva tagasi
    • oyes la aves dice falla

      Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez6 päeva tagasi
    • Hubo una fuga

      Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez7 päeva tagasi
    • Se calentó de un lado

      Jimmy B. Perez LopezJimmy B. Perez Lopez7 päeva tagasi
  • rip sn11

    Paul Huang Hau OngPaul Huang Hau Ong7 päeva tagasi
  • The guy announcing the launch sounds emotional at the end. He knows the hard work they do to get these test rockets up and running. They are test vehicles, they are supposed to fail to gather data so they can make the safest spaceship possible. It still hurts to see your baby get destroyed. Keep it going. One day people will be riding Starship like it’s commercial airline to the Moon and Mars.

    JasonJason7 päeva tagasi
  • ความร้อนสะสมเยอะเกิน

    Say greenSay green7 päeva tagasi
  • Such a flex to Nasa

    GabeGabe7 päeva tagasi
  • Are you kidding. 1.15 into vid, they still have the title up. Seriously

    Grant WilliamsGrant Williams7 päeva tagasi
    • Fair enough. My bad

      Grant WilliamsGrant Williams6 päeva tagasi
    • This is the unedited livestream.

      logitech4873logitech48736 päeva tagasi
    • Because it was streamed live

      This MonstrosityThis Monstrosity7 päeva tagasi
    • @Thong Han editing?

      Grant WilliamsGrant Williams7 päeva tagasi
    • Because this video was a live stream smart ass

      Thong HanThong Han7 päeva tagasi
  • Nice black screen...

    David PonceDavid Ponce7 päeva tagasi
  • Hopefully future test will be done in clear weather so we can have better visuals on what happened, in case telemetry data is incomplete.

    Raymond ErdeyRaymond Erdey7 päeva tagasi
  • When will this egomaniac stop playing with shareholders cash and start making a profit for dividends. Or better still, give a billion a month to Italy, France, Iran, Iraq, Syria and any African nation that isn't fighting a civil war. Have humanity before a toy rocket that sometimes works. And for what purpose ? Its a human disgrace and so is Virgin's version.

    GrahamGraham7 päeva tagasi
    • Why does everything else spaceX do fly out the fucking window the moment you talk about starship?

      Lmao.Lmao.12 tundi tagasi
    • SpaceX are a private company, and Elon owns 78% of the voting shares, thus giving him a supermajority. So the only shareholder he is beholden to is himself. He can do whatever he wants and the people holding the other 22% have no say in the matter. They knew what they were signing up for when they bought in, yet did so anyway, so clearly they feel they're getting a good deal. I for one would take that deal. When Starlink goes wide it's going to print $$$, regardless of Elon's antics.

      Brent SmithBrent Smith5 päeva tagasi
    • If for example Nasa was shutdown, I can almost definitely say that the money would only be put into more military/government stuff. It wouldn't really help anyone and if it does it's only short term while space exploration is long term for all humans. What I'm trying to say is in a perfect world the money would go to charity and stuff like that but in reality It would only be used to buy more army shit and nothing long term.

      ivanflinnivanflinn7 päeva tagasi
    • SpaceX isnt publicly traded lol

      alexn310alexn3107 päeva tagasi
  • Do you guys think you'll launch the next one at night during a blackout with blindfolds on the cameras so we can see even less?

    InspiredByFireInspiredByFire7 päeva tagasi
  • 😂 Our guardians will not let Spacex go out to space .Elon Musk has been working with the negative regressive alien alliance . Our guardians are here and we will soon hear about them soon with the UFO disclosure hopefully this summer that Trump signed off on the Covid relief bill before he left office. The world will know about the secret space programs and earth colonies we had throughout the galaxy within the past decades. They have lied and kept secrets from the American people.

    SarahSarah8 päeva tagasi
  • Hajmou nebesa

    Emir OmerovićEmir Omerović8 päeva tagasi
  • Thanks for using metric.

    Gacheru MburuGacheru Mburu8 päeva tagasi
  • I have one dream and one chance I'd get on that instead of seconds

    Mino MartinezMino Martinez8 päeva tagasi
  • Well, you can tell that was designed by men...

    Southern FernSouthern Fern8 päeva tagasi
    • Comedy gold

      Lmao.Lmao.12 tundi tagasi
    • I hope this is a joke but the man hate is making me question that lmao

      ivanflinnivanflinn7 päeva tagasi
    • the COO of spaceX is a woman lmao

      ColtenColten7 päeva tagasi
  • Yeah, that's what she said.

    thebeaz1thebeaz18 päeva tagasi
  • Such an incredible footage. Thank you Space X and Elon to integrate black screen... no racism in footage by Space X !

    M LM L8 päeva tagasi
  • Stable result is the sign of good skill...

    Ваня ЗолотаревВаня Золотарев8 päeva tagasi
  • Looks like the second engine was in some kind of distress on the ascent. At around 6:11 you can see a small fire break out on the right side of the engine. The plume colour was also a bit yellow-ish, I think this is suggestive of too much oxidiser (or fuel?), maybe there was a leaky pipe or something wrong with the turbo-pump. Perhaps this engine exploded on the landing burn, or the pipe ruptured and blew the tank.

    Alex ScottAlex Scott8 päeva tagasi
  • Oh no! The carbon footprint 👣! Greta help us! Uhhhhhh!

    Kurt NKurt N8 päeva tagasi
    • they really dont produce that much though...

      ivanflinnivanflinn7 päeva tagasi
    • These rocket produce less Carbon Dioxide than a Boeing 747

      Jack WhitlockJack Whitlock7 päeva tagasi
  • AMC

    Bandolero SanjuanBandolero Sanjuan8 päeva tagasi
EEworld